18.12.08

Paper, Plastic and People

When it comes to packaging, it is always this mind-boggling question “Paper or Plastic?” A hazy debate till date; consuming the common consumer, I started with asking friends and people. “Paper or Plastic”, why(s) and why not(s).

Upshots
90% ended up choosing paper.
Paper is readily biodegradable compared to plastic.
Plastic is harmful in some or other way to humans and environment.
95% of them never carried their own shopping bags in recent years.
70% reused their plastic bags though in rare instances.
98% of them look up to shops/retails to provide them with a positive alternative for existing bags.
Immediate alternative to plastic packaging/bags is only paper in their minds.
People are skeptical about durability of paper bags.
People like to reuse those plastic bags of cult and respected/popular brands.

In reality...

Paper can’t be a sustainable material, just because of its natural raw material and bio-degradability. We do a lot of deforestation to source its raw material; it is an unfair human play towards nature to use trees and plants as a source for an ephemeral substance like paper.
Then we bleach the extracted pulps and fibers from cut trees using chlorine gas; in turn those industrial effluents (we have 12,000 paper mills across the world, approx) will introduce chlorine dioxins in to our food chain.

In fact, we will need more energy for transshipment of paper bags compared to plastic ones. With all these pamper to encourage paper usage might exert a back pressure in the system increasing the demand for paper, which will call for more energy, more fuel and more cut trees.

The bio-degradability part; we ink them, print them with heavy metals and composite them with plastics, metals and what not, do we expect these other add-on elements to break down in to our environment along with paper when it is thrown away.

Then we have this recycled eco-friendly paper trying to save energy and natural resources, It is been said that, recycling 1 ton of paper saves 17 trees approximately and every virgin wood pulp can be made and re-made to live as paper for 5 to 7 life cycles.
Though, only one-fourth of post consumer paper recycling happens across. The whole process ends up consuming more fuel and energy compared to plastic recycling. It also calls for strong chemical surfactants for de-inking and chlorine agents to bleach, releasing more harmful effluents in to environment. Efficient methods of paper recycling are either evolving or yet to evolve. Paper packaging alone accounts for 15% to 20% of yearly land fill.


Well, Plastics! facts and figures apart, the word plastic means ‘able to be molded’, true! They are molded in to every moment of our life. We see them littered everywhere around us, no doubts these inorganic creations and synthetic chemicals can be an effective technical nutrient to feed the industry with waste as food. We have enough of them as waste.

Plastics don’t get created by compromising sensitive natural inhabitants like trees and plants, at least till the time we switch over to bioplastics. We only need crude oil, which may be available for at least another half century or end of life plastics to give birth to new ones. Rather they have long and longer life cycles enough to persist in this environment even after human life cycles. They are already in our food chain; our hormones have become smart enough to converse with the inorganic chemical molecules. Not to mention birds, animals and water life, they don’t have any rights to spoil earth as we humans do.

Come on consumers! Pause and give a thought; we no more have the luxury of throwing away things. It is plastic or paper; we can’t just throw away anymore, there is no more an ‘away’. The problem is not only with paper or plastic, it is with the people.

There is this infamous concept of ‘3Rs -Reuse, Reduce, Recycle’. Actually, this concept doesn’t fit many sustainability frameworks. Let us forget the choice between ‘paper and plastic’ for a moment. Avoid this choice altogether. Use paper bags or plastic bags; but reuse them, allow their enduring life. One has to figure out instances of use (paper/plastic/others), alternative plastic bags or cloth bags can be of better choices. Diligent reuse will automatically reduce consumption. These concepts of reuse and reduce are not really new to us, observe your grand parents attitude towards consumption.

Think before asking for another plastic bag!

8 comments:

  1. interesting article, here is some supporting poster from washingtonpost

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2007/10/03/GR2007100301385.html

    sisir

    ReplyDelete
  2. you say 15 to 20% of landfil is paper, what is the figure for plastic. i saw a few plastic recyling units in bangalore and indore - no protection for operators and quite a lot of fumes (which might be toxic).
    to make paper, one could source pulp from plantations rather than virgin forest however fr plastics, one has to mine petroleum ... not sure that is a good idea in these 'excess carbon in the air' times.

    i agree that the focus has to be people and their habits and chouces - its a matter of habit to take a cloth bag along when going shopping.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This really is a vicious cycle. I think the solution rests in our good-old cloth-bags. Of course, it is really below our vanity to be seen carrying unattractive cloth bags! So, I guess somebody needs to design funky looking cloth bags which we would be proud to show-off. There are many such companies around, I'm sure. Of course, I assume clothes manufacturing / bag-making is not in any way harmful to the environment.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sanskriti, I intentionally avoided the figures of plastic because many of them controversial.
    I am not taking any sides of paper / plastic / cloth.
    Almost all process has their positive/negative footprints over us,
    recycling is good, but with sophisticated science, which is hardly there anywhere in India.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Interesting Post Mohan! Yes, REUSE is the key. But unfortunately, the right mass-awareness is missing. Consumers are waking up to the call, but very slowly and that too in select segments. And its not just bags, think about paper being used in offices. How many offices actually re-use the one side printed paper? How many offices actually use re-cycled paper? How many of them try cutting the use of paper by using e-docs?
    One possible solution is Mass-awareness. Without that, I dont see the 'choice' being transformed to a more sustainable one.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Actually, there are 4Rs, the last being "responsibility". So let me add to the realm of responsibility.

    1. It takes 9 semi-trucks to haul the same number of paper bags for 1 semi-truck of plastic bags.

    2. Very little biodegredation goes on inside of most landfills. So unless you're planning on composting the paper sacks in your backyard, that tradeoff is of little value to the environment.

    3. I regularly reuse my plastic bags for other purposes -- I also try to reduce the number that are given to me at the grocery store. Anyone not doing the same is being irresponsible.

    4. Plastic bags are made from the waste products of the petroleum process.

    5. This is predominantly about the majority of people just being plain apathetic to any level of responsibility for their own ability to control what they consume. This really isn't a choice about paper or plastic -- it's a matter of good old fashioned responsibility (or lack thereof).

    ReplyDelete
  7. Vijay,
    Well why dont we think of better and sustainable options. Jute and Sisal are two such options. Besides ending the paper/plastic debate these 'jute and sisal' product consumption will also provide vital livelihood support to millions of Indian poor.

    The life cycle is also long, these are reusable and at the end of life..well...biodegradable as well!! Moreover people won't mind carrying a well designed, aesthetically appealing and easy to carry jute bag to a grocery shop.


    Lalit

    ReplyDelete